|
Restrictions on Access to Medications Include
- Drug Formularies
- Prior Authorization Requirements
- Fail First Policies
- Generic Substitutions
- Pharmaceutical Benefits Managers
- Therapeutic Class Substitutions
- Tiered Co-payments
- Dispensing or Prescription Limits
- Drug Utilization Review Boards
- Reference-Based Formularies
Supporters argue that, technically, consumers
still have access and that costs are reduced, but…
Restrictions Limit Access
Many consumers are forced to use medications that do not match
their treatment needs and many consumers suffer needlessly while waiting
for authorization.
- Restricted medications are often not prescribed. Due to
extensive paperwork requirements for restricted medications, many
prescribers often do not bother with the process at all, even when
the medication may be more effective.
- Consumers often are required to “fail-first.” In some cases,
consumers must have multiple treatment failures on the preferred medication
on the state’s formulary before gaining access to the appropriate
treatment.
- Consumers wait unnecessarily. The turn around of the prior
authorization process is often extremely slow.
- Consumers may unknowingly receive a different medication or a
generic substitute. Even slight differences in the chemistry
of a medication may harm the consumer.
|
 |
|
|
And Restrictions
Can Drive Up Costs
Studies have demonstrated that restrictive policies may achieve
short term cost reductions, but at a major long-term cost to overall
health expenditures:
-
A study in the New England Journal of Medicine noted that
limiting the use of psychotropic medications for those with schizophrenia
increased costs 17-fold because of hospital costs incurred.[i]
-
A study by Susan D. Horn, Ph.D., of the Institute for Clinical
Outcomes Research and other researchers found that the more restrictive
the formulary, the more patients used other, more expensive services.[ii]
-
A Federally commissioned independent study found that although
formularies do prevent access to excluded medications; any cost
savings are eliminated by increases in spending in other, more expensive,
service sectors.[iii]
-
When California’s Medicaid program tried to contain costs through
restrictive formularies, it found that the average prescription
cost per patient increased from $245 to $726, and the average number
of office visits increased from 3.2 to 6.6.[iv]
An Effective
Medications Policy Will:
-
Ensure that mental health consumers have access to the full range
of medications as a part of their treatment plan.
-
Entrust the provider and consumer to make decisions about which
medications will be most effective.
-
Explore the full range of community-based treatment options that
will enable consumers to remain out of crisis and avoid expensive
hospital care.
For additional information, please contact
the Advocacy Resource Center at 1-800-969-NMHA (6642), Option 6 or shcrinfo@nmha.org
back to top
[i] Soumeria, S.B., McLaughlin, T., J.,
Ross-Degnan, D., Casteris, C.S., and Bollini, P. “Effects of Limiting
Medicaid Drug-Reimbursement Benefits on the Use of Psychotropic Agents
and Acute Mental health Services By Patients with Schizophrenia.”
New England Journal of Medicine, 331: 650-655; 1994.
[ii] Horn, S. “Intended and Unintended
Consequences of HMO Cost-Containment Strategies: Results from the
Managed Care Outcomes Project.” 1996.
[iii] The Lewin Group- SAMHSA. Health
Plan Benefit Barreirs to Access to Pharmaceutical Therapies for Behavioral
Health: Findings. October, 1998.
[iv] Schiller, M. A Prescription for
Medi-Cal. Action Alert. Pacific Research Institute. June 1998.
back to top
|